"An
interstellar adventure story worthy of Golden Age masters like Isaac
Asimov and Robert A. Heinlein. " -
Dave Duncan,
author of the
Seventh Sword
series, the
King's Blades
series and
Children of Chaos
Web
edwardwillett.com
LIBRARY
NAVIGATION
SYSTEM:
Click on a CD to
access data
Interested in receiving my science column every week by e-mail?
You've got it! Just enter your e-mail address below.
The Angel and the
Devil on the Shoulders of Your Teen
Copyright 2007 by Edward Willett
While I am still some seven years away from having a
teenager of my own, I well remember being a teenager, and being
occasionally asked by an exasperated parent, "What were you thinking?"
To which, as often as not, I replied, "I don't know." This was seldom seen
as an acceptable answer.
Had I but been one of today's fortunate teens, I could have bolstered my
profession of ignorance with scientific evidence.
Meg Gerrard, a professor of psychology at Iowa State University, recently
analyzed 12 years of studies of adolescent risk-taking. Her conclusion:
when kids tell their parents they don't know what they were thinking when
they did something risky, they're telling the exact truth.
Her studies, of risky behaviors including smoking, the use of alcohol
and/or drugs, and unsafe sex, have involved more than 10,000 youths from
all over the United States.
"We've demonstrated that quite a bit of adolescent decision-making is not
reasoned on--on any level," she says. "It's not because it's motivated
behavior, or they've thought about how much they want to do it. It's
because they just do it."
Gerrard recently gave a presentation at the annual convention of the
Association of Psychological Science in which she detailed what she calls
"A Dual Process Approach to Adolescent Decision-Making."
She says there are two ways humans process information to make decisions.
They may reason things out and then decide that they will do something, or
they may simply act on intuition. Most research on adolescents has been
based on the idea that they make decisions based on reason, when in fact
many risky behaviors are spur-of-the-moment impulses, usually a reaction
to being in circumstances conducive to engaging in those
behaviors--typically because they're surrounded with friends or peers who
are engaging in those behaviors. (Think parties that get out of control.)
"From a kid's perspective, if you're operating in this more reasoned,
thoughtful mode--then you have the proverbial devil and the angel over
your shoulder," she says. "If you're operating in the more experiential
(impulsive) mode, then you don't even know the angel is there...and the
devil's only saying, 'This could be interesting.'"
Laurence Steinberg, a psychology professor at Temple University, recently
published an article saying much the same thing. He says the brain has two
behavior-controlling mechanisms: the "cognitive-control" and "socioemotional"
networks.
He notes that during adolescence both networks are maturing--but they
mature at very different rates. The socioemotional system becomes more
assertive during puberty, while the cognitive-control system strengthens
more slowly and over a longer period of time, not fully maturing until the
mid-20s "at least." Worse, the socioemotional system kicks into high gear
in the presence of peers or when emotions run high, overpowering the
cognitive-control system, which is more likely to be in control when an
adolescent is alone and not emotionally excited.
So even the best-raised, well-informed-of-the-risks teen may sometimes do
something incredibly risky and stupid. Which has got to worry parents.
Fortunately, Gerrard said, the likelihood this impulsive mode will lead to
risky behavior is based on the social images the kid in question has of
kids who engage in that kind of behavior.
These images, Gerrard says, are "formed very early--we have evidence that
they're formed when kids are seven to eight years old--and it's not that
difficult to change them. Oftentimes kids who are not willing to engage in
a risk behavior are not willing because they don't have a favorable
prototype (of someone engaging in that risk behavior)."
So her advice for parents?
"What I think most parents and most prevention programs try and do is get
kids to think about the potential negative consequences before they engage
in a behavior. That's good, but it's not enough," she said. "It needs
reinforcement and you need to change how they think about people who
exhibit those risky behaviors."
You can bet I'll take that advice to heart as we raise our
not-quite-halfway-to-being-a-teenager over the next few years.
And, hey, she's already promised she'll never paint her bedroom walls
black, so I'd say we've got nothing to worry about...
...have we?
These weekly columns on science appear
in the Regina
(Saskatchewan) Leader Post and Red Deer (Alberta) Advocate. They are
available for one-time publication or regular syndication to any
interested newspapers, magazines or on-line publications.
E-mail me for details.