"An
interstellar adventure story worthy of Golden Age masters like Isaac
Asimov and Robert A. Heinlein. " -
Dave Duncan, author
of the Seventh Sword series, the
King's Blades
series and
Children of Chaos
Web
edwardwillett.com
LIBRARY
NAVIGATION
SYSTEM:
Click on a CD to
access data
Interested in receiving my science column every week by e-mail?
You've got it! Just enter your e-mail address below.
Advances in Apples
Copyright 2006 by Edward Willett
If “an apple a day keeps the doctor away,” it’s
rather surprising there’s still a need for doctors, considering
Canadians consume around 11 kg of apples per person per year.
They can choose from a bewildering array of apple cultivars, too (more
than 7,500 are known), from the crisp and tart (Macintosh) to the soft
and sweet (Red Delicious).
But the quest for a better apple, it seems, is never-ending.
The domestic apple, Malus domestica, is a member of the family Rosaceae—the
same family as roses, which may explain why apple blossoms are so
appealing. Malus domestica’s wild ancestor, Malus sieversii, still grows
wild in the mountains of Central Asia.
The legend of Johnny Appleseed to the contrary, commercially apples are
propagated by grafting, a form of cloning practiced for a couple of
millennia now. Breeders graft the shoots and branches of a tree whose
fruit they like (the scion) onto a new trunk and root system (the root
stock), creating a hybrid. If not for this, there would be no consistent
apple varietals: if you plant a Golden Delicious seed, you won’t get
Golden Delicious apples from the resulting tree, because, the seed
contains too much genetic variability. In fact, you’ll likely get
something more like a crab apple.
The choice of rootstock matters: different rootstocks bring out
different qualities in the scion. Nobody really understands the process
very well, though. Researchers in Pennsylvania are trying to learn more.
Tim McNellis, assistant professor of plant pathology at Penn State
University, says it’s not a case of genes migrating from the rootstock
to the scion; rather, the rootstock somehow turns on genes that are
already present.
McNellis is concentrating on the Gala apple (an important cultivar in
Pennsylvania), and one trait: disease resistance. He grafted Gala scions
onto two different rootstocks, then scanned the genetic makeup of each
to see which genes were active. He found that one kind of rootstock
turned on twice as many stress tolerance genes in the scion as the
other—and that that scion was more resistant to a bacterial disease
called fire blight. This year a team of researchers will be examining 20
different rootstock varieties. If the research bears fruit (sorry) then
growers will have new information about the best rootstock to use—and
plant breeders will understand more about how rootstocks affect scions.
Meanwhile, in New Zealand, researchers at the fruit science company
HortResearch have come up with an apple that’s red—not just on the
outside, but all the way through. And they’re working on green, gold and
purple ones.
The company began work on a naturally occurring red-fleshed apple in
1998. Its external appearance, eating qualities and storage capability
didn’t meet commercial needs, but by crossing it with high-quality
white-fleshed apples, HortResearch created apples with flesh ranging in
colour from white to pink to purple. They’re focusing on the red-fleshed
apple because the colour is so appealing.
HortResearch is home to the world’s largest database of fruit genes and
compounds and is in the process of making public 50,000 apple DNA
sequences, called Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs), that identify active
genes—genes that actually do something. Using their EST database, the
HortResearch scientists practice smart breeding, using genetic screening
to pick out the best breeding prospects from among tens of thousands of
seedlings. Being able to hone in on the best candidates for producing
desirable fruit should greatly reduce the time necessary to create a
viable new cultivar, from a couple of decades to as little as five or
six years.
HortResearch emphasizes it is not genetically engineering its apples:
it’s using standard breeding techniques. Researcher Abhaya Dandekar at
the University of California, Davis, however, has been genetically
engineering apples, and he’s come up with fruit with more sorbitol and
less sucrose and fructose, three sweet compounds all naturally found in
apples. Since sorbitol has only 2.6 calories per gram, 45 percent less
than sucrose and fructose, what he’s really developed is a low-calorie
apple. And although he used direct genetic modification, he says plant
breeders could achieve the same results with regular breeding
techniques. Not only that, he believes related fruits such as pears,
peaches, plums and cherries could also be produced in low-calorie
varieties.
Pomologists (apple scientists), it seems, are not resting on their, um,
blossoms. Though apples may keep doctors away from people, apparently
they actually attract people with doctorates.
SPECIAL ONLINE-ONLY ALTERNATE COLUMN ENDING!
Though engaged in a kind of science some might find seedy and ripe for
graft, pomologists cling to their roots, attempting to stem the doubts
that worm their way into the public's heart, polishing pomology's
reputation, in the hope that someday its core value may be better
recognized, and its appeal may yet blossom and grow.
These weekly columns on science appear
in the Regina
(Saskatchewan) Leader Post and Red Deer (Alberta) Advocate. They are
available for one-time publication or regular syndication to any
interested newspapers, magazines or on-line publications.
E-mail me for details.