"An
interstellar adventure story worthy of Golden Age masters like Isaac
Asimov and Robert A. Heinlein. " -
Dave Duncan, author
of the Seventh Sword series, the
King's Blades
series and
Children of Chaos
Web
edwardwillett.com
LIBRARY
NAVIGATION
SYSTEM:
Click on a CD to
access data
"Amateur" is a word with a split personality.
Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad.
Many of the world's top athletes are "amateurs," and
nobody suggests they're not as good as the "professionals." In fact, I've
heard many people say they'd rather watch amateur figure skating than
professional skating, because the amateurs put more into it and take more
risks.
In the arts, however, the word "amateur" has an
almost universally negative connotation. If we see a painting that we
don't think is very well executed, we may call it "amateurish." The phrase
"amateur film maker" conjures up images of wobbly, out-of-focus images
(which also describes The Blair Witch Project, but never mind) and
when it comes to theatre--well, "amateur theatre" is obviously inferior to
"professional theatre," isn't it?
Or is it?
I don't believe it is, and I say that as someone who
has been involved in both.
The fact is, while "one lacking in experience and
competence in an art or science" is one definition of amateur, it isn't
the only one. Higher on the list, according to Merriam-Webster's online
dictionary, is "one who engages in a pursuit, study, science, or sport as
a pastime rather than as a profession."
There is nothing in that definition that relates to
quality in any way, and nor should there be in the definition of "amateur
theatre," or, for that matter, "amateur artist," "amateur photographer" or
"amateur singer."
Not everyone who has a talent, or even a passion,
for a particular art form, can make a living at it. That would be nice,
but it's never going to happen. That doesn't meant that that artist can't
do work that is just as good or important as those who can.
Regina has an enormous number of extremely talented
individuals in the arts. Some are making a living at it, some aren't--but
they're still finding outlets for their artistic endeavors. What they
don't always find is an audience.
Consider, for example, A Little Night Music,
the Stephen Sondheim musical staged by Regina Lyric Light Opera last May.
It was, beyond a doubt, one of the best local musical productions ever
seen in this city. It featured an entirely local cast of actors and
singers who have the ability to work professionally (and in many cases
have--three cast members and the director were members of Canadian Actors'
Equity Association), but who chose to be in this production simply for the
love of performing. It was a visual and aural treat, all for a ticket
price of $15--less than half of what I spent to fill my gas tank
yesterday.
The audience? Less than 1,000 people.
In December, by way of contrast, more than 6,000
attended productions of The King and I and Showboat. They
were touring professional productions--competent, but uninspired. Were
they any better than A Little Night Music? Honestly, no. But people
who would never dream of paying $15 to see a local amateur production were
willing to shell out four to five times as much for them, just the same.
I performed in A Little Night Music, for
free. I've also performed in operas and plays for pay. To the best of my
ability, I give the same level of performance in both amateur and
professional theatre, and that holds true for every other performer I know
who has worked in both worlds.
Regina Little Theatre, Regina Summer Stage, tye
productions, the Regina Philharmonic Chorus, the University of Regina
Chamber Singers, Juventus--the list goes on and on of local arts
organizations that full of talented individuals whose efforts deserve more
attention and appreciation than they get from a society that too often
equates "amateur" with "inferior."
On the contrary, I firmly believe "amateur" is
sometimes superior to "professional," at least when the professional art
form becomes staid and predictable. I'll put the freshness and excitement
of an amateur performance limited to a run of five shows up against the
here-we-go-again feel of a touring group that may be on its 150th
performance any day.
So here's my plea, and my challenge. Give local
amateur arts groups a chance. Don't write them off because they're not
"professional." Don't save your money to go to the next Showboat by
not going to see Regina Summer Stage's The Sound of Music this
summer, or Regina Lyric Light Opera's Fiddler on the Roof in May,
or Regina Little Theatre's Noises Off in February. Don't spend all
your money on that Britney Spears CD when you could buy one by Juventus or
the University of Regina Chamber Singers or some talented local band whose
members all have day jobs.
After all, a community that believes that local
talent equates to no talent, and only money determines worth, isn't much
of a community at all.